Bruno Landi
interview given by the Department of Budget, Luigi Barigelli, our Stephen affects Blacks, among others, a fact that deserves attention. And, in my opinion, a serious reflection.
says that the Councillor in the prediction of 2010, compared to the previous forecast, " we expected lower running costs for more than 380 000 € . A considerable sum, even in that regard - Councillor are still words - " all sectors were affected by the cuts ... and we managed to keep all the main services ...."
I mean now to find myself in agreement on this "line" followed in setting the budget. Although it is a line dictated by the current laws and may not be a free choice. It is my opinion, not today, you need more rigor in the expenditure of all public bodies: Ministries down, passing through regions, provinces and municipalities. And not only out of respect for citizens, who are constantly demanding more sacrifices. But also to gradually get rid of that weight abnormal interest expense (70 € billion) each year that weigh heavily on state coffers.
And I wonder whether the financial statements prepared "true", and verify the ongoing financial year, how was it possible, for the same services provided to "save " 380 000 €? I do not think just eliminating waste. Or filing here and there or all of the different items of expenditure. I'd like to know in detail how it is moved, because I am among those who believe that substantial savings in public budgets, are obtained only with a strict "personnel policy."
says that the Councillor in the prediction of 2010, compared to the previous forecast, " we expected lower running costs for more than 380 000 € . A considerable sum, even in that regard - Councillor are still words - " all sectors were affected by the cuts ... and we managed to keep all the main services ...."
I mean now to find myself in agreement on this "line" followed in setting the budget. Although it is a line dictated by the current laws and may not be a free choice. It is my opinion, not today, you need more rigor in the expenditure of all public bodies: Ministries down, passing through regions, provinces and municipalities. And not only out of respect for citizens, who are constantly demanding more sacrifices. But also to gradually get rid of that weight abnormal interest expense (70 € billion) each year that weigh heavily on state coffers.
And I wonder whether the financial statements prepared "true", and verify the ongoing financial year, how was it possible, for the same services provided to "save " 380 000 €? I do not think just eliminating waste. Or filing here and there or all of the different items of expenditure. I'd like to know in detail how it is moved, because I am among those who believe that substantial savings in public budgets, are obtained only with a strict "personnel policy."
0 comments:
Post a Comment